tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post8543721533431286431..comments2023-11-03T00:06:36.875+11:00Comments on Bunyipitude: Wendy's Wonderland -- Part VBunyiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14668398379654771814noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-17203280515344116302011-08-05T19:10:17.391+10:002011-08-05T19:10:17.391+10:00Anonymous,no,not curious about Flannery as he is n...Anonymous,no,not curious about Flannery as he is no mystery whatsoever. And has nothing to do with the curious case here.Nickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09537772941984056434noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-12773698893589280942011-08-04T18:03:22.337+10:002011-08-04T18:03:22.337+10:00Well,we now know where The Oz got Howard Brady,and...Well,we now know where The Oz got Howard Brady,and how Brady inserted himself into discussing someone else's work without their knowledge...Oz editor Clive Mathieson has blithely stated,in a statement to Media Watch, that Brady brought the news of the paper to them,and offered his two cents.They accepted his credentials without question...<br /><br />Hooray,Stuey Rintoul writes the wrap around,Brady sets the interpretive focus...on which Mathieson denies any agenda,claiming they fairly represented the paper and author. Butt a full nine paragraphs are dedicated to Brady's insistence that the paper ruins the CSIRO/IPCC projections,which is not the focus of the paper at all.The paper's author is relegated to a few comments towards the end of the piece.<br /><br /> The OZ claims they contacted the CSIRO for comment,which a CSIRO sea-level expert denies...<br /><br />The Oz claims Watson did not object,but we've ALL seen the letter to the contrary from Watson's employer,the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage.<br /><br />Great days in journalism.Nickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09537772941984056434noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-52392479318657206962011-08-04T18:02:23.079+10:002011-08-04T18:02:23.079+10:00"Bunyip,ever wonder how Brady got to be ponti...<i>"Bunyip,ever wonder how Brady got to be pontificating outside his field in that article?"</i> <br /><br />Nicko, ever wonder how the Panasonic Flanno Man (Sponsored by Prius) got to not just be pontificating outside his field (what's that you say, he has a Greater Monkey Faced Bat named after him, well THAT's all right then.....) but scored $720,000+ out of our hard-earned paycheques for it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-49947960018042553862011-08-03T22:31:10.020+10:002011-08-03T22:31:10.020+10:00It might be their ABC but we are paying for it Th...It might be their ABC but we are paying for it They are not news people they are like some propaganda crew on a mission RED". Well, we all have something to look forward to with Flannery wanting to control our intelligence , i'm sure that's going to work out well .The ABC is more like a zoo of idiots if you ask me except for a few faint cries for reality .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-84050666016728983232011-08-03T20:42:25.018+10:002011-08-03T20:42:25.018+10:00Bunyip,ever wonder how Brady got to be pontificati...Bunyip,ever wonder how Brady got to be pontificating outside his field in that article? Was he just walking past Rintoul's cubicle,and Stu liked the cut of his jib? Did The Oz specify somebody whose initials were H.B and had no publications on sea-level study? Where DID they get him?<br /><br />Why was Brady the first 'expert' to be quoted,despite Phil Watson being clearly introduced as the reports author,and his photo heading the article? Why did Brady get everything he said about the paper or the subject wrong?<br /><br />Why would Watson' employer be moved to write to The Oz in complaint about Rintoul's handling of the story?Nickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09537772941984056434noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-43856541437547982412011-08-03T16:36:29.630+10:002011-08-03T16:36:29.630+10:00It their ABC.It their ABC.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-51468337608293313552011-08-03T12:28:34.045+10:002011-08-03T12:28:34.045+10:00Keep up the good work. About time someone put a ro...Keep up the good work. About time someone put a rocket up the smug slackers who pose as journalists at their ABC and the nonsense they peddle. Saw you mentioned in today Australian! Well done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-70660388497524914862011-08-03T11:12:20.241+10:002011-08-03T11:12:20.241+10:00Brady needs to flog his credentials for all they&#...Brady needs to flog his credentials for all they're worth, but in the right way: e.g. "I'm surprised nobody takes me seriously when they've got no trouble believing Flannery, who's a paleontologist just like me."Perturbedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10708803081795229778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-85944254340437720072011-08-03T10:59:28.447+10:002011-08-03T10:59:28.447+10:00Seems Holmes is not banned from Carlisle's in ...Seems Holmes is not banned from Carlisle's in box.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-90374490996985287172011-08-03T10:49:40.214+10:002011-08-03T10:49:40.214+10:00I'm with Anonymous.
Give'm both barrels - ...I'm with Anonymous.<br />Give'm both barrels - Holmes is a bigger wank than Wendy dear.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-81003041488120473222011-08-03T08:24:40.981+10:002011-08-03T08:24:40.981+10:00Hey Prof good to see you in this morning's Oz ...Hey Prof good to see you in this morning's Oz Cut & Paste. I do hope you keep going after La carlisle. She's a thin-skinned ABC lefty hack and if Holmes won't take her down then you'll have 2 scalps. His for being a partisan ABC lefty hack and her for being an untouchable Pilgeresque joke.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14457232127152238.post-14811693999487391652011-08-02T20:45:11.773+10:002011-08-02T20:45:11.773+10:00A retired paleontologist. I'm surprised they ...A retired paleontologist. I'm surprised they didn't slip into a Borat-style voice to pronounce "retired" as "retard"...arnoreply@blogger.com