Monday, July 22, 2013

Perfect for short leg



It should be obvious by now that Australia’s First XI must take the first step toward redemption by sacking Michael Clarke and appointing Kevin Rudd as captain. While he might not be able to match the current leader’s batting average, it speaks in his favour that he has never been romantically involved with Lara Bingle – proof that he is at least somewhat more intelligent than the younger man, who cannot be given out without squandering yet another pointless appeal to the Third Umpire. If Rudd were to don the baggy green, Fairfax and the ABC could then report his every rash and ill-considered stroke as examples of genius. We might (no doubt will) still lose the next Test, but Australians would never have to endure the ignominy of hearing reports that our best had been bettered yet again by a bunch of pasty, hollow-chested Poms raised on diets of warm beer, baked beans and boarding school sodomy.

New captain installed, the next remedial effort must concern Watson, whose propensity for surrendering his wicket to LBWs suggests a solution first tried in baseball.



Yes, let us replace Watson, and Hughes as well, with proper, bona fide, low-to-the-ground midgets, whose tiny little pads will prove almost impossible targets.

Indeed, two potential saviours of Australian cricket have their green-and-gold bags packed and are ready to go.


As with the Rudd cabinet, expect the ABC to announce their inclusion as a further example of the new captain's winning gift for the bold stroke.





5 comments:

  1. Midgets? Tut tut, Professor! The PC mob will be after your goolies for this one! Little people, if you please!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunately, Prof, the size of the batmen and their pads makes no difference to the lbw law. A midget can get hit in the head and still be given out lbw. Ask Sachin Tendulkar.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQ_uXUe8e6g

    ReplyDelete
  3. No doubt others will point this out Prof, but this amusing piece is based on a misconception about the LBW rule. To quote Wikipedia, "[t]he basis of the law is that, following an appeal by the fielding side, the umpire may rule a batsman out lbw if the ball would have struck the wicket but was intercepted by any part of the batsman's body except the hand holding his bat".

    Re baseball, I think that at one point, possibly during WW2, a one-armed man played in the major leagues. Cricket Australia could not do any worse.

    Your tag "and if it doesn't work PNG can have 'em" might well be adopted for general use to describe a gigantic snafu. Just as "knitted the kangaroo" is becoming our equivalent to "jumped the shark".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. Chap named Peter Gray, of the St Louis Browns in 1945,
      http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Pete_Gray_1915
      2. And the statutary involvement by Abbott:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Abbott

      Cheers

      Delete
  4. Thanks Minicapt. Although in the end Gray became a recluse, his story is a good one.

    ReplyDelete