WHAT A remarkable America awaited David Hirst when he moved
to there in the 1980s. According
to his account of US “gun culture”
1/ Children take AK-47’s to school for show-and-tell, and
teachers are more or less fine with this
2/ US cops offer guidance in how best to shoot troublesome
neighbours
3/ Savvy, gun-smart American friends equipped him with a shotgun
for personal defence
4/ That shotgun was a weapon the like of which no gunsmith
has ever seen. On the one hand, according to Hirst, it was “an over and under”,
meaning it had two barrels. In the same breath, he describes it as “single-barrelled
pump-action killing machine”
5/ He was beaten up not, just by a thug but by a top-shelf
Aryan Nations thug.
Oh, and one final curiosity. Early in his column, Hirst
recalls being threatened with a pistol in a Carlton pub by career criminal and
Pentridge hunger-striker
Christopher Dale Flannery. This
happened in 1981, according to Hirst, which is very odd because Flannery
had been behind bars since late in 1980, awaiting trial for the murder of
bent lawyer Roger Wilson. He remained in custody until his acquittal in October
of the following year, which still did not leave Flannery much time to be
sporting small arms in an Elgin Street waterhole better known for artsy
regulars like playwright Jack Hibberd. As Flannery left court he was immediately arrested and spirited off to Sydney to face another murder
charge.
Hirst is an SBS documentarian, so it would be wrong to doubt
a word he says. Wrong, but very hard not to.
UPDATE: Hirst's reference to a double-barrel shotgun with but a single barrel has been removed and the column re-written. It now reads, "A friend delivered a Winchester shotgun capable of killing close up or at a good distance."
Shouldn't Fairfax also be posting a little advisory that the text has been corrected?
UPDATE II: In a further bit of tinkering, Hirst's column is now graced by a note announcing it has been amended to correct "an incorrect description of a weapon". That is not the classroom AK-47, evidently, which remains in the copy. Readers wishing to see the improbable original will find Hirst's handiwork sealed in the aspic of ink on paper copies of The Age.
UPDATE III: A Fairfax insider writes: "Some of us hoping the redundancies will persuade editors who publish this crap to get out and get lost."
UPDATE: Hirst's reference to a double-barrel shotgun with but a single barrel has been removed and the column re-written. It now reads, "A friend delivered a Winchester shotgun capable of killing close up or at a good distance."
Shouldn't Fairfax also be posting a little advisory that the text has been corrected?
UPDATE II: In a further bit of tinkering, Hirst's column is now graced by a note announcing it has been amended to correct "an incorrect description of a weapon". That is not the classroom AK-47, evidently, which remains in the copy. Readers wishing to see the improbable original will find Hirst's handiwork sealed in the aspic of ink on paper copies of The Age.
UPDATE III: A Fairfax insider writes: "Some of us hoping the redundancies will persuade editors who publish this crap to get out and get lost."